It is sometime argue that the major function of a university is to train graduates to become a well prepared employee with techniques or knowledge required in workplace. While, I agree that universities should provide the vocational training courses, I do believe that universities should also play a role in providing knowledge for its own sake.
There are several reasons why the universities’ programmes should be designed to nurture the practical skills in their occupations. Firstly, some of the occupations require professional knowledges, such as doctor, nurse, engineer etc. In order to train those professions, universities must design the job oriented curriculums that allow students to focus on their unique skill sets and allow them to fulfill certain accreditation requirements. Secondly, many students expected to equip themselves with useful vocational skills in the universities, thus universities should allocate resources and support on the career development for graduates. Finally, many employers require candidates to have deep understanding in certain aspects of academic, therefore it is necessary for the universities to teach those specific knowledge to students.
On the other hand, universities are not only the place to train labor force for workplace. Many courses provided by universities may be less practical in workplace, but they are beneficial for personal development and critical thinking. For example, the liberal arts and philosophy encourage students to appreciate various cultures in different nations and the relationship between individuals and communities. Although some of the course may be less useful for the career development, the knowledge is still valuable which lead students to become more mature and capable.
In conclusion, while I believe that universities should train students with professional skills for their occupations, it is also important for the universities to provide liberal education.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...l skills in their occupations. Firstly, some of the occupations require professional knowle...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n individuals and communities. Although some of the course may be less useful for the caree...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82006920415 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26612440599 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9964311503 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.166666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373531241184 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14102383876 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890990605333 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25201336366 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810222440663 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.