Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours

1. Nowadays, higher education is becoming increasingly popular to students who have just graduated from high schools. Therefore, what the universities should provide for the undergraduates has been a controversial issue. Some individuals think that universities should give students knowledge and skills necessary in a workplace. However, others believe that they have to provide a key to knowledge, regardless of its usefulness to an employee. In my opinion, undergraduates should accumulate more and more knowledge instead of kills for a certain employee.
The main reason why students go to universities is to get acquainted with the area they are going to work, to achieve special skills for this area. Thus, the courses that are closest to the students chief subject are crucial therefore, a prominent proportion of time is spent on them. Besides by developing particular skills of undergraduates specialization, they are able to get experience which would be useful for their future profession. Nevertheless, scholars become narrow-minded due to advancing in certain spheres. Thein abilities are limited consequently it contributes to inability to learn new skills.
We must admit that giving access to knowledge has its drawbacks. Compared with the first situation students have no specialization in determined branchs. Accorclingly, their chance to get highly demanding work is low. Due to the fact that undergraduates lack experience and practice, they may not think of their dream work. On the other hand, diverse and profound knowledge help students develop sustainedly. Actually, students who have many extended knowledge can live better than others. In the modern society, since communication is becoming important day by day knowledgable individuals can solve issues more easily. Furthermore, another advantage of giving more knowledge is flexibility in getting experience. Students who take profiencies from different areas are able to broaden their horizons and open their minds. As a result, they become versatile in each sphere where they got experience.
In conclusion, I think that the benefits of giving access knowledge for its own save for universities outweigh that of providing the knowledge and skill for working. In my opinion, know-how can be more useful in our everyday life. Overall, we acquire knowledge for life, not only for work.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become narrow-minded due to advancing in certain spheres. Thein abilities are lim...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, their chance to get highly demanding work is low. Due to the fact that underg...
^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much extended knowledge', 'a good deal of extended knowledge'.
Suggestion: much extended knowledge; a good deal of extended knowledge
...ustainedly. Actually, students who have many extended knowledge can live better than others. In the mod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...versities outweigh that of providing the knowledge and skill for working. In my o...
^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... knowledge for life, not only for work.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54696132597 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15804821377 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57182320442 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5408467331 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3043478261 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7391304348 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82608695652 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331046341448 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922620480614 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116823948044 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219862515253 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116325646736 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.