Some people think young people should be free to choose their job, while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent times, it is highly probable that career consideration is inextricably interwoven with the life quality of many people. Hence, stances are indicating that adolescence should pursue a career path of their interests, whereas the opposite viewpoint believes that pondering upon one’s future requires rationality and throughout consideration. Given that a realistic outlook and careful anticipation about the labor market climate might help young adults to quicken the process of achieving materialistic possessions, from my point of view, career choices should be based on one’s willingness and preferences. Both facets of the matter will be elucidated in this essay before drawing any further conclusion.
On the one hand, since the labor market is somewhat becoming more significantly dynamic, young people should put more concern and research on their future careers. To specify, when young adults have observed the erratic flow of changes regarding job prospects in the future, they might have a clearer mindset about choosing a profitable job carefully over pursuing one on arbitrary and temporary interests. To cite an example, being an accountant may allow employees to have a stable income and receive an acceptable promotion as opposed to a high potential of suffering from economic setbacks seen in many independent artists. Therefore, it might be reasonable to be partial to giving a myriad of thoughts on future plans.
On the other hand, when looking from a broader viewpoint, freedom in choosing a career may benefit young people in the long term. To elaborate, when employees working in a field that they have a passion for, they could contribute more of their time and stamina for the enterprise or business. By virtue of the relentless devotion, they could mitigate the possibility of being burned out or hinder the chance of developing a sense of anxiety and distress. What is more, the act of young people putting profit gains on top of their priority list is also synonymous with putting more workload burden on themselves, therefore, by shedding light on this example, it is crystal clear that choosing a career upon one’s personal interests could help them to remain perseverant with their current employment.
In conclusion, notwithstanding carefulness in opting for a career being the cornerstone of future work achievements and monetary possessions, I am of the opinion that the prerequisite for a lucrative career is based upon passion and determination. All things considered, the overall benefits of freedom in job option has eclipsed those of thoughtful employment planning.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2217.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39416058394 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98524579356 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571776155718 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6373318654 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.357142857 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3571428571 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284383700717 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087829446444 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480174431329 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157569535583 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530813745811 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.