Some students prefer to take a gap year and between high school university to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
People differ greatly in their views whether students should take a year off before pursuing higher education. While this trend is benifical to some extent, I would contend that the drawbacks are more significant.
There are two compelling reasons why taking a break from studying after graduating high school exerts some positive effects on students. First and foremost, this activity may enable students to enrich themselves with real-life experiences that are advantagenous to their careers in the future. This is because, if students get a paid job during the gap time, they could learn the important working skills, such as communication, time management skilss and leadership, which the recruiters often seek. Furthermore, choosing a gap year to travel to different places can lead to an improvement in students’ social, cultural knowledge. As a consequence, not only are these students more mature but they can also be easy to intergrate in globalised world.
However, I firmly convinced that there are more disadvantages to students who take a gap year. The main reason is that it may be difficult for students to recall the knowledge and studying skills that they acquired in high school after a year off. An exellent example of this is that when students get a physically demanding jobs in this time, they will be too tired to revise any knowledge. Another convincing reason is that travelling during the gap year can fascinate students in discovering, thus they may distract from learning. This can be culprit to a decrease of the academic results of students when they continue their studying at university.
In conclusion, although spending a gap year before following university program is benefical in some aspects, such as providing students key skills and knowledge for their jobs in the future, I would argue m that this trend is associated with many disadvantages, including the difficult in recalling pass knowledge.
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 61
- cities owadays people use bicycle less as a form of transport. Why is that? What can we do to encourage people to use bicycle more? 61
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 67
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 73
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch themselves with real-life experiences that are advantagenous to their careers ...
^^
Line 2, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not only are these students more mature but they can also be easy to intergrate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24038461538 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93006748166 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4372613035 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309515470304 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112661060949 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498161980907 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185008475833 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452367888452 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.