space tourism will it bring positive or negative effects on the world s development Give your own opinion Use exmple based on your experience

In the last decades, the vast majority of tourists have travelled to space for the enjoyment. In my opinion, space tourism will definitely fetch positive impacts on the world's development. This essay will discuss firstly the negative influences of space journeys, and secondly, on how the space travel remains truly worthwhile with relevant examples.

On the one hand, critics insist that the space tourism is proving to be exceedingly perilous and unhealthy. Even if the space flight involves in a minor incident, the mortality rate will generally remain high. For instance, since 2013, 18 deaths were reported where 8 demises were simply secondary to the trivial spaceflight incidents. In addition, astronauts who remained a long haul in the space were revealed to have loss of bone and muscle mass promptly because of zero gravities. Next, the costs of travelling to space is genuinely sky-high which can cause the country's economy to get worse if the company does not find right stuffs. This can be exemplified by the fact that the journey of American Dennis Tito, the first paying space tourist, had cost him estimated 10 million dollars in 2001. What is more, the growing commercial spaceflight is truly liable for contributing global warming. 1000 suborbital launches of rockets can release 600 tonnes of black carbon, escalating the global temperature according to the study by NASA.

Having said that, i strongly consider that the advantages readily outweigh the drawbacks of the space tourism due to the following reasons. Firstly, in spite of the expensive fares, space trips have enabled for the manufacturing of processes that are not possible or costly on the earth. For example, a microgravity environment allows for bacteria to build faster and denser, and antibiotics to grow at an enhanced level. So space tourism tends to be a huge benefit to pharmaceutical companies looking to increase yields and lower costs. Secondly, various planets in the space are found to be an ideal alternative habitation where every activity of daily lives becomes transformed into a new experience. Gazing at the stars and the moon, twinkling and lighting the earth and living in weightlessness is endlessly fascinating. It (planet) is not only a safe place to live in during the spell of terrible disasters but also a root of minerals and fossil fuels that are predicted to yield 10 billion dollars, surpassing ultimately the high priced tickets of the expedition.

In conclusion, considering the discussed benefits, presumably, the space tourism can exert positive influences on the globe's development.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (5 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...efinitely fetch positive impacts on the worlds development. This essay will discuss fi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'globes'' or 'globe's'?
Suggestion: globes'; globe's
...sm can exert positive influences on the globes development.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84891568795 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626794258373 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9207157715 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.789473684 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168293171937 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549855012327 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732512391734 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127239001732 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674486349235 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
No. of Words: 418 350

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 418 350
No. of Characters: 2139 1500
No. of Different Words: 261 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.522 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.117 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.767 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 159 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 132 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.473 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.737 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.458 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.052 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5