Tourism can bring people to anywhere on the planet Earth and even enable them to discover the outer space. For many reasons, traveling outside our planet seems appealing to many individuals. In my opinion, space tourism is inappropriate for its following disadvantages.
To begin with, traveling to the outer space should serve scientific purposes only for its astronomical cost. It costs at least 250 thousand dollars per person for a trip and more than 3 months for preparation, which only rich people can afford. Also, our human knowledge about the universe is limited and needs enlarging. Money, energy and time , therefore, should be used for researching and discovering the universe instead of sightseeing or satisfying the curiosity to see the outside world for real.
Furthermore, tourists may risk their lives while going on an outer-space tour. No matter how well-developed our technology is, travelling into the space is exceedingly dangerous for the abundant accidents may come along with it. Accidents are unavoidable and they are extremely deadly if happen in the weightless environment. Tourists may stand a high chance of losing their lives if in-flight emergency or any situation leading to a tragedy happen.
Taking into consideration the other side of the argument, those who disagree may claim that it can be economically beneficial due to the considerable cost of space tourism. Rich people paying for space trip can both satisfy their desire and broaden their knowledge about the universe. Moreover, the possibilities of accident can be lessened thanks to technology advancement and pre-boarding well-preparedness.
To conclude, space tourism is disadvantageous for the mentioned reasons. However, depending on the situation, it can benefit the economy and allow people to discover safely the world outside the Earth.
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 67
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... needs enlarging. Money, energy and time , therefore, should be used for researchi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, at least, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44405594406 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10261088773 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6812254972 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264864557247 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898094149256 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575454278044 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154356127422 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409194110917 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.