Although new techniques and ways are being applied in agriculture to produce more crops and to gain more food, people in some parts of the world are still facing the problem of starvation. This is mainly because of the consumerism culture of the today world and the geography of the region where those people live itself, but there are a number of solutions to tackle this issue.
One possible reason of people going hungry might be people’s obession with consumerism, which encourages us to buy food more than we need. In other words, even though the amount of food produced is increasing with the help of new technology, all of it goes to the hand of the rich who tend to buy more than they need. As a result, people in poor countries are still having starvation no matter how abundant the food becomes. Another factor contributing to the problem is the geographical features of the region, for example, no rain for several years or extreme drought, which are not suitable to grow crops. Those make people in that area unemployed and finally, they become starved.
There are two solutions which might have a great impact on above issues, one of which is dontating food to the hugry by the rich. Even if the rich people in the USA alone donated food to those people in need, it would save thousands of lives who are dying due to lack of food. Moreover, the wealthy need to practice the idea of buying the necessary amount to ensure that there is a sufficient amount of food for all the people on earth. Another solution is investing a lot in agricultural science to be able to modify unsuitable regions to fertile lands. According to the saying, “where there is a will, there is a way”, if scientists have a strong dertermination, they will definitely make a breakthrough to transform those wild area into croppable places to solve the problem of world starvation.
In conclusion, despite the fact that new techniques are used in agriculture to increase food production, it is not enough to feed the world population. Therefore, new technology needs to be discovered and the weathy should donate food to solve the current problem.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The diagrams below show how chocolate is made and how the price of a chocolate bar is divided up among those involved in the process Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons Write at least 150 73
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77688172043 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65473151815 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2809480905 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169664366737 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612005851356 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488047963085 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119194881198 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620774473884 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.