These days, most teenagers are inclined to socialize online instead of communicating and interacting face-to-face with others. This essay will outline some main reasons and suggest some measures to resolve this problem.
There are numerous reasons why virtual classrooms and conservations are more preferred by teenagers. Firstly, it is more convenient and beneficial for teenagers who are pretty shy, have introverted personalities, and isolate from society to attend virtual meetings. This will create more opportunities for them to voice out their real characters, express their feelings, which they even can not speak out or show when directly communicating. Secondly, with the development of online meetings, teenagers can keep in touch and make friends with many people, especially with foreigners. For example, if you build up an overseas friendship with those who are suitable for your personalities and interests, you not only have enormous unforgettable memories but also are learned and discovered about overseas cultures and people here. As a result, this useful knowledge makes a contribution to your studies at schools.
In order to overcome and deal with this problem, there are some essential solutions suggested. To begin with, the government should take action to propagate the drawbacks of spending the Internet to attend online meetings. For instance, they can spread some illnesses and diseases relating to the eyes or head if they use a computer in the long-term. Furthermore, the government also enhances and increases the higher price for online meetings to reduce the number of adults who access the online meetings and virtual classrooms. Last but not least, teenagers should be aware of the importance of face-to-face conferences or direct meetings. This plays an integral part to help people realize the benefits of some direct meetings and limit spending their time on online websites.
In conclusion, adults prefer to access and attend virtual meetings for the following reasons. This tendency can be dealt with and resolve effectively by some essential suggestions
- Many animals are being endangered by human activities both on land and in the sea What actions can harm the existence of animals What can be done to prevent this 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 89
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- As well as making money businesses should also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51702786378 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92560977479 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0479172344 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204847141365 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670490652307 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330902963968 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128145009738 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108282658586 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51702786378 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92560977479 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0479172344 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204847141365 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670490652307 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330902963968 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128145009738 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0108282658586 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.