in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development

In the contemporary days firms usually advertise their products to be new in some aspects. This is mainly because of consumer behavior and companies strategy, which brings either advantages and disadvantages for businesses. In terms of positive side, by emphasizing the new goods that companies create, everyone would know products with new quality, perhaps getting rid of the pitfalls having on the old ones to enhance the standards of their ouputs. As a result, businesses can gain the trust of their consumers. Furthermore, some people want to see new things in progress. Due to they simply want to refresh themselves with new type of products, or they probally are trend followers who are inspired interests by celebrities and the others, looking for their incentives.
On the other hand, there are lots of weakness for this ads form. As for big brands that have certain kind of imprerative credibility would be disadvantaged in some way. For instance, Coca Cola and Pepsi regularly launch campaigns with their changes of shape bottles. This can compel consumers demand in purpose, but might sometimes lead to consumers fatigue as businesses just pretend to make their goods seem to be innovative. In fact, there is no any considerably evolvement had been made. Besides, the development of more and more firms nowndays does not attract consumers impression anymore, particularly the start-ups and small companies can hardly compete to the big brands which have been used by majority of consumers for a long time.
In conclusion, this advertising way depends on the psychology of suppliers and consumers in two directions, but the risks tend to outweigh the good perspectives.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...er hand, there are lots of weakness for this ads form. As for big brands that have c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...are lots of weakness for this ads form. As for big brands that have certain kind o...
^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...eem to be innovative. In fact, there is no any considerably evolvement had been ma...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, look, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21402214022 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89676122759 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0682920924 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284316627082 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959872380548 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693812159749 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17930682118 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794316119021 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.