There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.
What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?
Recently, more researches indicate that human beings are contributing the global warming. The essay will outline what habitants’ activities are likely to accelerate the increase of temperatures and how the trouble can be solved.
To begin with, according to scientists, the emissions of greenhouse gas such as CO2 are the main factor of greenhouse effect. With the development of modern society more people are wealthy enough to own private vehicles such as cars and scooters for transportation. However, the CO2 that emitted by those machines is one major source of greenhouse gas produced by habitants. In addition, the deforestation by multinational companies in rainforest area such as Brazil and Indonesia also makes the problem worse since trees can absorb enormous CO2 produced by human activities through photosynthesis.
To deal with the issue, there are some actions that we can do. In the short term, citizens can try to take metro or buses rather than drive their own cars to work and use more recycled papers in the office. In the long term, governments should invest more on environmentally-friendly industries such as public transportation, recycling eco-systems and clean energy. In addition, councils need to formulate the law to limit the logging activities in forests.
In conclusion, in my opinion, the emissions of CO2 by vehicle and deforestation by international company are to blame for global warming. To solve the problem, habitants can drive less and use recycled more papers; and the authorities should develop environmentally-friendly industries and reduce deforestation through regulations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-18 | Diogo Silva | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.What is your position? Discuss b 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 54
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 92
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 36
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...recycling eco-systems and clean energy. In addition, councils need to formulate th...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t the logging activities in forests. In conclusion, in my opinion, the emission...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.548 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52617866819 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8060061985 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.583333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128861301657 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476669636055 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452553513067 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830060140418 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497200423714 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.