The creation of world was uniformity for everyone. No one is rich and poor by birth some circumstances make them rich and poor. Wealthy nation can help the poor nation as they are more wealther than poor countries.
I strongly agree with the statement that wealthy countries should help the poor countries for the sake of humanity. Therefore, richer countries have number of resources and facilities that can help the poor nation at the time of natural disasters. Moreover, due to lack of money and facilities poor nation do not recover the lose by natural calamities. As they need some financial help from wealthy nation. Further, wealthy countries should set up industries and provide job opportunities to poor countries people that help the both the nation to develop.
No doubt, government is a head of the country that have a responsibility to fulfill the needs of its citizens. As government is by the people, for the people, to the people. Government of poor nation can take some foreign direct investment from another country to provide job opportunities to people. Apart from that, more resources should be provided by government to its citizens so that they can fullfil all the needs. Besides that, sharing resources and help other countries create a peace in tge the world. The relationship between wealthy nation and the less affluent nations will be improved after all the support.
In the epilogue, wealthy nation can help the suffering countries by natural disasters to some extent by providing some basic facilities. Poor nation should also do some thing for their development rather than depend on other countries financially.
- IELTS 10 Test 3 Writing Task 1 - Academic 11
- Happiness can be bought with money according to some people, but others believe it can not be purchased 22
- Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others think money and appearance are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d facilities poor nation do not recover the lose by natural calamities. As they need som...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...recover the lose by natural calamities. As they need some financial help from weal...
^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
... facilities. Poor nation should also do some thing for their development rather than dep...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oor nation should also do some thing for their development rather than depend on...
^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion should also do some thing for their development rather than depend on other ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, therefore, after all, apart from, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12962962963 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74021266184 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7265529389 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5625 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257178256946 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982391005907 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073041747537 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174438825282 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837648284323 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.