There are many punishments being set by government to be imposed on the delinquency. The heaviest punishment in Malaysia is the capital punishment, which is also known as death penalty. Many people have the presumption that capital punishment will provide more security to our lives and reduce the criminal cases. They assume that this punishment can control violence in our society. I agree to this assumption to a certain extent. In this essay, I will share my opinions regarding this assumption and discuss why others think it is not essential to control crime rate in the society.
First and foremost, I agree capital punishment can be used as a way to control violence in the society because of its intimidating effects. I have to confess that everyone does not want to die. We know that life is precious and therefore, we should treasure our life. With the increasing in criminal cases such as drug trafficking and murder, capital punishment is the punishment for delinquent. There have been many cases which are drug trafficking and murder occurred in Malaysia. In order to avoid punishment, those who have convicted the crime ran to overseas such as Australia as they know life imprisonment will be imposed instead of capital punishment if they are arrested. I believe death penalty is important to be imposed to act as a warning to the society so that they would not commit the crime.
One the one hand, it is reasonable to have capital punishment in a country due to its intimidating effect. On the other hand, people argue that it is not humane to sentence the delinquent to death. They are against the death penalty because if society is to sentence the delinquent to death, the society is acted like a murderer. There is no difference between the society and murderer if capital punishment is being used by a country. They suggest to replace the capital punishment with life imprisonment. This is no doubt a merciful way from the religious’ point of view in which the delinquent is to be imprisoned for his whole life instead of being sent to death. They believe this is a better way because the delinquent can have the time to remorse of the crime he has convicted. In such a way, when the society is being mercy to delinquent, they will be less violent.
To sum up, I agree that death penalty can reduce criminal cases to the minimum but not to zero. This is undoubtedly a cruel punishment to those who have convicted a crime, though. It is the reason why there are many countries which are on the way to abolish capital punishment and replace it with life imprisonment. Some people think that the delinquent has his or her own human right as well. The country should not take away a precious life just because of the crime he has convicted.
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 59
- "Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing up their children."To what extent do you agree 76
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behavior What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 66
- car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past three years that many cities in the world are now one big jam.how true do you think this statement is?what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars? 70
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest replacing'.
Suggestion: suggest replacing
...shment is being used by a country. They suggest to replace the capital punishment with life impris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'no doubt', 'such as', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232245681382 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.199616122841 0.155533422707 128% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0614203454894 0.0946595960268 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0326295585413 0.0501214627716 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0614203454894 0.0437548338989 140% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0998080614203 0.122226691241 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0460652591171 0.0403226058552 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71832056861 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0556621880998 0.0326793684256 170% => OK
Particles: 0.00383877159309 0.00163938923432 234% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.109404990403 0.0861772015684 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021113243762 0.021408717616 99% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0172744721689 0.011925033212 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2774.0 1933.35771543 143% => OK
No of words: 482.0 316.048096192 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75518672199 6.12580529183 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.20517956788 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.313278008299 0.374742101984 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269709543568 0.28420135186 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.163900414938 0.203846283523 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112033195021 0.137316102897 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71832056861 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.037074148 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402489626556 0.56093040696 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.9560353722 60.7387585426 74% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0891783567 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5384615385 20.7743622355 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2869029802 49.517814964 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 127.492653851 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.7743622355 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.814263465372 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 45.5094158953 49.1944974215 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.28758169935 1.69124875643 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458109844083 0.332605444948 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.137316832323 0.102741220458 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0998478210185 0.0668466124924 149% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.488965675162 0.534860350844 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12342289915 0.148594505496 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179165762017 0.134430193775 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744216622059 0.0742795772207 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.577450498477 0.324371583561 178% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0112875535149 0.0638462369009 18% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357379733268 0.228012699653 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585752873492 0.058150111329 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 3.9879759519 552% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 5.90881763527 34% => OK
Negative topic words: 20.0 2.5751503006 777% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 22.0 10.4468937876 211% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9