Young people who commit serious crimes such as a robbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree

There is a heated debate on how to tackle the soaring delinquency rate and whether young criminals should be punished in the same way as adults being punished. The debate over this question seems to consist of two irreconcilable poles. This essay discusses both sides of the view and then I will give my own perspective.

On the one hand, punishing young criminals in the same way as adults are treated can have several advantages. Firstly, it will set out a good example about the associated bad consequences for to-be-criminals. It is often the case that youngsters tend to engage in crimes due to poor judgement and less experience about the life, especially when they are not properly guided by parents, hence they would not measure the bad outcome it might bring. If they can witness serious punishments, it will deter young adults from engaging such activities. Another advantage is that, in this way, victims always get the fair justice regardless of the age of the criminal. For example, had a young murderer been sentenced to far less punishment than he deserves just because he is a youngster, it would have been very unfair to the respective victim and the family.

On the other hand, treating minors in the same way as adults can be too extreme and may have detrimental consequences. In other words, punishments can be too hard to bear by juveniles and it may harm them not only physically but also mentally. Moreover, this could result in destroying their whole life ahead. There are better ways to handle delinquency rather than going for extreme ends. It is better if they are given a second chance after being thoroughly advised or rehabilitated, so that they would never attempt to take the wrong path once again.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their merits. However, I believe that young adults should not be treated in the same as standard criminals are treated, and they should be given a second chance to allow them to become useful adults eventually.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in other words, in the same way, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86217008798 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69178820136 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574780058651 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3912427288 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219734143034 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06970916597 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764694661869 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140981253391 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254988685612 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.