There have been different views about whether fast food exerts positive or negative impacts on an individual’s life. While in some ways, it might be reasonable to admit that this convenient food contributes to the hustle life of the twenty-first century, I would argue that its drawbacks outweigh its benefit.
These following reasons will give explanations for my opinion. One of the primary factors is the unhealthy ingredients of fast food. It is an apparent that a small number of food at convenience stores contains bodily-necessary nutrition, the rest of them include high sodium, sugar, fat, and cholesterol with full of oil in its. Furthermore, by dint of eating hamburgers, fried potatoes, pizza or spaghetti on a regular basis will pose a serious threat to human health. As has been outlined earlier, those food have should-not-eat ingredients which easily cause dangerous diseases such as heartache, high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, consequently, life expectancy declined dramatically. To exemplify, junk food industries are more likely to suffer high Mortality Rate except they acquire advanced and modern medicine in their country. Another disadvantage is the more comfortable of fast food, the more distance of people. When people being caught up in the rapid growth of technology and over competitive life, they tend to choose instantly food in lieu of a home-cooked meal to save time. As a result, family members have less time to enjoy gathering atmosphere where everyone shares the happiness and sadness they have been through within a week, it seems like the best meaningful moments in our life after facing difficult times without family by side.
Contrarily, a number of people consider eating fast food as an effective time-saving way so that they can use the time to promote their productivity. There will be undoubtedly about its convenience, however, the above views mentioned that, how bad if people continue to consume fast food regularly. In this way, how productivity performance can be enhanced with those who are overweighed and easily to get illness?
Taking everything into consideration, fast food is not without advantages, nevertheless, the upsides will justify these. For this reason, I still believe that convenience food is detrimental for people
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Advertising is all around us it is an unavoidable part of everyone s life Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is negative Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say that in order to be happy you must have a job you love doing Others say that other factors are more important Do you think that people can only be happy if they have a job they really enjoy Give reasons for your answer and include any rele 56
- Some people say you don t need much money to be happy What do you think 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ts of fast food. It is an apparent that a small number of food at convenience stores contains bod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 500, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...n health. As has been outlined earlier, those food have should-not-eat ingredients which e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... performance can be enhanced with those who are overweighed and easily to get illness? ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35359116022 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01571436544 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649171270718 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7511415406 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197953797742 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634664222755 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416565290247 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130392914828 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024207667652 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.