Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, tourism industry has been flourishing across the globe and playing a vital role in the economy and recognition of many countries. It is asserted by some people that overseas visitors should be charged more for their visits to tourist places than localities. I completely agree with this notion and intend to discuss my views in subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, one school of thought believes that charging greater from other nationalities would tarnish the image of country. This is because such decisions can promote discrimination on the basis of nationality and visitors may take it as unfair treatment. As a result, people would refrain themselves from coming to such countries. However, it is quite justified that these charges should be less for local people as they have already been paying taxes to government since many years, thereby, deserving subsidiary rates in their native nation. In contrast, if these prices are same for natives then it would be unjustified. Moreover, this practice is being followed successfully by many countries in the world such as Dubai and Singapore, and still these countries are very much popular among tourists.
On the other hand, I endorse the concept of charging higher amount from foreign visitors. The prominent reason is that preserving and maintaining these monuments required a lot of money, and it should be arranged for preservation process. Demanding some extra amount, not only use for the maintenance, but also can play crucial role to boost economy of a nation. For instance, Thailand`s 80% of the economy dependent upon tourism and travel and if such countries start giving concession to all visitors then there can be devastating situation for them. In addition to it, providing international facilities to tourists is not 'everyone`s cup of tea', instead, a well managed structured system is necessary for the upkeep of such famous sites. It is due to financial resources that government can provide international grade amenities such as tourist guides, translators and brochures to tourists, which is another important component to attract right audience and uplift tourism industry.
In conclusion, although it could be seemed a challenging decision to charge extra fee from global travelers, yet it is essential step to keep the glory of historical buildings as well as to boost economy and provide world class services to visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-13 | tiendung00001 | 67 | view |
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes, haricuts and beauty products to enhance their appearance. Some feel it is a good way while others feel that there are better ways to spend money.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- It is much more convenient to watching movie on television or computer than to buy ticket and going to the cinema. In the nearest future, the popularity of cinemas will drastically decline. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that it is important to spend a lot of money on wedding celebration while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. Do 84
- Your friend is coming to stay in your neighborhood He has asked some information about the school Describe the school Give your opinion Why his her children would like it 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...countries start giving concession to all visitors then there can be devastating s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31428571429 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93573604556 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592207792208 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.277642727 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.875 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9375 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152783473278 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04699201379 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555727883688 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893736304472 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474756574531 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.