Formal examination are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this What is your opinion

Essay topics:

Formal examination are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. What is your opinion ?

Education is the fundamental right of everyone in this world which plays a pivotal role for one's development. Considering this, a segment of society believe that students should be assessed through the formal examination however, many people support the view of continual assessment process instead. This essay will assert both view points before delivering a plausible conclusion.

To begin, some people consider that formal examination is an effective way to evaluate student's performance as it provides a single platform and timeline for all pupil to show their caliber which ultimately , help teachers to filter out bright students according to their performance. Moreover, such exams are conducted under the supervision of an invigilators which prevents any feasibility of finagle.

However, continual process of assessment have numerous advantages for the children who are not possessing good grasping power and are unable to perform wisely in time constraint exams. Hence, continual assessment such as coursework and projects enable pupils to explore practical knowledge of their subjects. Moreover, a single examination doesn't cover the whole scope of a book.

To recapitulate, this foregoing discussion propounds that both continual and formal examination are very productive to evaluate the performance of students, while having some drawbacks. Therefore, government should take some initiatives to eradicate those weak points which are detrimental for the education system.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (12 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-03 kapila Manocha 74 view
2019-10-12 Roshanip 77 view
2019-05-17 coolchris2100 78 view
Essays by user karan81093 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...is world which plays a pivotal role for ones development. Considering this, a segmen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l to show their caliber which ultimately , help teachers to filter out bright stud...
^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an invigilator' or simply 'invigilators'?
Suggestion: an invigilator; invigilators
... are conducted under the supervision of an invigilators which prevents any feasibility of finag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...umerous advantages for the children who are not possessing good grasping power and are unable to p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ubjects. Moreover, a single examination doesnt cover the whole scope of a book. To ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84862385321 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0016154613 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6758601093 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269019413476 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899354118408 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776046018355 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144298271084 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432120411001 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.