Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.
What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to this problem?
There has always been a lack of freshwater in some areas of the world. Undoubtedly, dramatically increased demand has made this an international issue. Nonetheless, accurate measures by governments and people could solve the problem.
There are ample of reasons behind the growing demand for the water. The main cause for this is, unstoppable growth in population. Today, there are 7.5 billion people are living on the earth. Although, earth is comprising of 70% water and 30% land, only 2%of 70% is mineral water. And, that is why there is a scarcity of water in most of the areas of the planet. What is more, in day to day life of a human being we use a lot of water. In Australia, Melbourne, average usage of water per household is 250 liters per day, for example, surveyed by government authority. Besides, another cause is intense use of water in growing industries. As per unites nations data, in industrialized nations industries consume more than half of the water available for human use.
To tackle this crisis governments and people should take desperate actions and ought to work in hand in hand. Governments ought to impose high tariff on the industries for the excess usage of water, as a result it would restrain people from using water relentlessly. Moreover, similar to Singapore government every government could give incentives and grants who would hit the acceptable usage of water, consequently, it will encourage people to use water carefully. Whereas on individual basis person must use water carefully, otherwise next generation will be at disadvantage soon.
To conclude, it is apparent that there are many factors which increases the demand of water, but also there are heaps of solutions to tackle this problem. I believe this measures will work in favor of mankind to conserve and save water.
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem.What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to thi 78
- Fewer and fewer people walk daily. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking? 84
- Today more and more students decide to move to a different country for higher studies Do you think that the benefits of this outweighs the problems 80
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology. For example, the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive in t 73
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...living on the earth. Although, earth is comprising of 70% water and 30% land, only 2%of 70% i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in hand'.
Suggestion: in hand
...ake desperate actions and ought to work in hand in hand. Governments ought to impose high tarif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, whereas, for example, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78144792551 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1939494917 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8888888889 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17650896861 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668991693319 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594254877696 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144616934718 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971283935828 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.