Some believe traditional shopping will be over soon due to development of online shops. I partly agree with this notion based on some reasons.
Several proofs are demonstrated about extension of online shopping. Firstly, people would be beneficial in different ways. For instance, they would use their time more efficiently and purchase their needs more easily as well. Online statistics and modern tools like reviews, will also help them choose wisely. Secondly, this trend have positive impacts on supply chain, via helping suppliers in various ways, including less stuff recruitment and efficient premises costs. Finally, society and government would become influenced by good aspects of online shopping. Preventing heavy traffic jams may be a clear example of these influences.
Despite the good results of online shopping development, some individuals may avoid following this trend. Among them elderly people and the ones with low technological skills, may prefer common shopping manners. Whilst, they would be convinced to adapt themselves and enhance their abilities to cope with the needs of our new world. Another group who are bothering by this idea know shopping as a hobby, although, they would change their entertainment habits in accordance with technology in the future. However, different personalities would prefer different ways based on their characteristics, but I personally believe that communication technology would change their mindset and adjust their behavior in harmony with new world needs. Therefore, from my personal standpoint, life style changes in our era are inevitable.
To sum up, beside the obstacles in the way of spreading online shopping among customers, it’s development would be an undeniable part of our century.
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Task 2: Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational values. Discuss both views and give your oppinion. 78
- A company is organising a trip abroad for language training to a number of limited places. Write a letter to the manager of the company. In your letter, you should:• express That you want to join• say why you think you should join• explain why the o 78
- Some people think its better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them. Other people it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61940298507 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83619400531 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9028250748 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123948983394 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457443066484 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493430016005 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914688157615 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362217336492 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.