The concept of mandatory military service, which has been implemented by numerous countries as a means of providing national defense and promoting patriotism, initially appears to be a desirable solution. However, upon closer examination, it is clear that extending this obligation to both men and women is not without its drawbacks and drawbacks.
From a practical standpoint, military service entails physical and mental demands that can be overwhelming for individuals, regardless of gender. For instance, those with physical disabilities or medical conditions may not be able to perform their duties effectively, putting themselves in harm's way. Moreover, combat situations can have a lasting impact on soldiers' emotional well-being, leading to conditions such as PTSD and depression, which have been documented by the American Psychological Association.
Additionally, the notion of compulsory military service disregards individual freedom and autonomy, as it forces individuals to participate against their will. This undermines the value of voluntary service, which allows individuals to choose to serve their country based on their own beliefs and convictions. Furthermore, a deeper sense of commitment and dedication is often seen in those who choose to serve voluntarily, as opposed to those who are obligated to do so.
Furthermore, the idea of compulsory military service for women raises gender equality concerns, as women may face discrimination and unequal treatment within the military. For example, in the Israeli Defense Forces, women are often assigned to non-combat roles, despite their capabilities and interests. The compulsory military service for women may also perpetuate societal attitudes that view women as inferior or less capable than men, perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes.
In conclusion, the concept of compulsory military service may seem like an attractive solution for national defense, but it is evident that it is fraught with practical and ethical challenges. Instead of forcing individuals to serve, it is more appropriate to promote voluntary service, allowing individuals to choose to serve their country based on their own beliefs and convictions. This approach not only results in a more dedicated and effective military, but it also fosters a more patriotic and inclusive society, in which individuals have the freedom to make choices that align with their values.
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 92
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
- As a part of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to those who are obligated to do so. Furthermore, the idea of compulsory military servic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74722222222 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12480987076 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.291245536 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 147.785714286 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24308777247 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841336577052 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049048143475 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129721648586 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455894770311 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.