The complexity of performing in front of a large gathering cannot be handled by everyone. It is many peoples' perception that this skill is ought to be taught from the school level. This essay puts a spotlight on the prominence of this skill, mostly agreeing to the above-cited information.
Firstly, let's discuss the necessity to accustom to address a huge crowd. Obviously, it pumps anyone high on confidence. Although it is not a cakewalk, once mastered helps indigenous individuals in standing out anywhere. Moreover, it helps us in creating a peculiar identity in any field in which we opt for a career. For instance, let's consider any office-oriented job where presentations are required every now and then. The ones who are good speakers gain a reputation passing all the hurdles. So, it's always essential to be a good speaker.
Jumping into the extent of agreement of the statement, I mostly stand with it. The responsibility of indulging this talent into children highly lies on the shoulders of educational institutions. If they fail in accomplishing this task, then who will? This skill can only be tackled if one has been working upon it since schooling. As we cannot find any other better place to learn such things schools should help out children in being proficient presenters.
Thus the prominence of speaking out and undeniable responsibilities of schools has been briefly discussed. This essay is concluded in the agreement of the given statement as all the necessary information is submitted.
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climate variations are increasing now days The government have taken measures at global level but they got only few solution why is this and how can this problem be solved 80
- More and more people do online shopping Why is this the situation What is the effect of online shopping on shops and communities 56
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006
- Scientists believe computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people think the development have a positive impact others think it is negative To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...ed job where presentations are required every now and then. The ones who are good speakers gain a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s been working upon it since schooling. As we cannot find any other better place t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...dren in being proficient presenters. Thus the prominence of speaking out and unde...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13306451613 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09084351037 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649193548387 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1428540915 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8823529412 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5882352941 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257967827581 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693168328233 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768229061903 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154821470947 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108585268866 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.