In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion?
In past few decades because of massive urbanisation in metropolitan cities they have become hugely crowded and their is awful shortage of land for residence and one of the alternatives being suggested is to move towards countryside. Members of the public speculate that this notion should not be promoted as it necessary to maintain the status of the latter. I agree to this view but up-to a certain extent as it is undeniable for housing problem in rest places.
The first point worth mentioning is that making homes in the countryside would diminish the natural beauty, fresh air which are integral part of that ecosystem. Additionally, the calmness and serenity one experiences by being in such peaceful environment would be gone. So as the population would start moving in close proximity to countryside; gradually overtime it would in-fact become into a busy city itself full of city-dwellers polluting the neighborhood. Thus having no movement between cities and countryside will have its own set of benefits which cannot be overlooked.
On the other hand it is well known fact that metro-cities today have residential issues. As the cities population grew and further land got acquired. This lead to rise in prices of houses to an unprecedented height because of the land shortage. As an alternative, it has become a necessity to live where property space is available. Another key-point to emphasize is that this movement can help prosper the countryside into thriving business center and as a consequence of this relocation would provide viable income source.
In conclusion, it would be ridiculous to argue that their is no housing issue. Whilst, before moving to countryside government should intervene and have proper guidelines defined for residential homes. So that the uniqueness, natural beauty of countryside remains intact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | mohammadras | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | royamoradi | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | sohailahmad | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | abcd1234 | 73 | view |
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many people like to wear fashionable clothes Why do you think this is the case Is this a good thing or a bad thing 67
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there is more advantages to living in an apartment.Are there more advantages or disadvantages of living in a house compared to living in an apartment. 84
- Film stars and music celebrities may earn a great deal of money and live in luxurious surroundings, but many of them lead unhappy lives.Do you agree? To what extent is this the price they pay for being famous? 84
- Write a letter to a friend who is visiting your country for the first time.- Tell him the best time of the year to come.- What places they could visit- Invite them to come to your house 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ies they have become hugely crowded and their is awful shortage of land for residence...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...as the population would start moving in close proximity to countryside; gradually overtime it w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...s today have residential issues. As the cities population grew and further land got ac...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 53, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...n, it would be ridiculous to argue that their is no housing issue. Whilst, before mov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, so, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29491525424 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97837460903 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5932779988 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.133333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0673592249375 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223394183411 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224596590813 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0425690273989 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121504717135 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.