More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poo

Working abroad is a dream of many people especially from developing countries or under developed countries. Instead of staying in their home country and work on a job available there, they move somewhere else with a hope that their life will be better. This brain-drain situation has been around for many decades and it is unlikely to stop. In my opinion, I believe it is a part of world economic competition and everyone can participate.

People move to another country because of many personal reasons. Firstly, when a skill of a person is developed to a certain level, jobs available in the country may no longer fit that skill and the person may not be paid well. The only way to find a better job is to look into a global market and move away. Furthermore, working in the global market also allows workers to work on challenging job with many amazing people from around the world. More than that, local situation in the home country such as political unrest also drives some talented people out of the country.

On the other side, governments are also the players in this global market. Either rich or poor countries can do best at their available resources to keep talented people at home country by promoting advanced technology development locally or pulling in world class employers into the country using tax incentive. Nonetheless, people are not assets of the country, they should be free to move anywhere as long as they are not guilty in a criminal case and the other country welcome them in.

In summary, just like how water flow from higher ground to lower ground. People move from countries to countries as long as they can find a better place to live and work. Governments should also do their best with any kind of incentive to keep talented people in the country instead of promoting nationalism.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, well, in summary, kind of, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77848101266 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54871618153 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6529906529 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269722233425 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922045651023 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711174734327 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173139852971 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363134122826 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.