Over the past few decades there have been a stimulating discussion about airlines providing more benefits to the rich by reducing the areas used by the economy class to provide more comfort to the first class passengers.
I agree that airline reduces the areas of the economy passengers to create more luxury for the first class passengers. Today many airlines advertise suit that comes with its own bathroom, toilet and a big bed for comfort to those traveling by first class.
Beside, they also build clubs, swimming pools, casino, drinking bars and cinemas for those that purchase first class ticket, in other to create more room and more fun to first class travelers at the detriment of economy passengers comfort. The question everyone is asking is, where do you think this areas of luxury is coming from, if not from the economy class?
Though, some think that the first class areas already has unused space that is been created for the comfort of first class travelers. If this thinking is true then, there should also be some unused areas in the economy class that needs to be created to prevent those traveling by economy class standing on queue in other to use the toilet and the struggling of moving their legs when traveling by air. Meanwhile, the Federal government needs to review both the economy class and first class so that every one will have a good traveling experience and will always want to travel again by air.
Today, many passengers do not want to travel by economy class because of the discomfort associated with economy class, but some have no option because they cannot afford first class there end up using economy class which is so unfair to them.
In conclusion, many airlines use the areas provided for the economy class to achieve comfort for the rich at the detriment of the economy class. The federal government should have a review on how this airline used the areas of the economy class and the first class to help all travel with good experience.
- Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children.What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 59
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 85
- A rise in the standard of living in a country seems to only benefits cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced? 78
- PTE essay:It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- You are working for a company. You need to take some time off work and want toask your manager about this.Write a letter to your manager about this.Explain why you want to take time off workGive details of the amount of time you needSugges 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uces the areas of the economy passengers to create more luxury for the first clas...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...eryone is asking is, where do you think this areas of luxury is coming from, if not ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng from, if not from the economy class? Though, some think that the first class ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the struggling of moving their legs when traveling by air. Meanwhile, the Fe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, while, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78779069767 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27407906047 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447674418605 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9354335324 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2727272727 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487260272987 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24443941655 0.084324248473 290% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126018351817 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321327138346 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114270705274 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.