Nowadays, more and more foreign students are going to English-Speaking countries to learn the “international language – English". It is undoubtedly true that studying English in an English-speaking country is the best way, but it is not the only way t

The English language is a universal speaking language. For some, it's like an imperative asset to communicate with others, especially in different speaking countries. However, others feel this is not only the way around instead there are anonymous methods to gain language skills. This essay will examine both points of view before arriving at a reasoned conclusion.

As many argue, fostering to study English in English speaking countries is a wise use of learning. There are several merits to this position. For one, they will seek native speakers and get ease while learning skills. In India, for example, a tremendous amount of money is spent every year to preserve and promote the English speaking skills. These efforts give a plethora of windows to use English on a daily basis. Another benefit is the way in which a person can live a high style of living a life. The advantages of this point of view are thus very clear.

Other people, however, feel such spending money is wasteful and neglects a nation's more pressing needs. For instance, the English coaching in our country has a very reputable benchmark and multiple institutions where everyone can learn as per their ease. India is up and up running every single day, It is thus understandable why many are supporters of this position.

The above discussion illustrates how nuances between the mindsets of people make it impossible to recommend a set spending pattern for all the people. The English-speaking country is thus best to learn English and become a native speaker.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...spending money is wasteful and neglects a nations more pressing needs. For instance, the ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03515625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72069961975 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6171875 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5209328781 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5625 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330085269204 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106811840708 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130197189244 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194457980614 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546626142798 0.056905535591 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.