It is widely argued that due to increased fee and less number of job opportunities, universities should offer more technical and medical courses instead of art, history, and philosophy. I strongly disagree with this view. From my point of view, art and history are vital for our society. This essay will elaborate on the facts to support the stated opinion.
To begin with, even though technical and medical fields are more in demand and they have lucrative job offers, but there are numerous people who are more keen on learning art, history, and literature. By eliminating these fields from the education system, universities would deprive people of learning their choice of field. Furthermore, students should be provided with equal opportunities to explore all majors. Hence, they can decide later which stream is more suitable for them. For example, students have to study subjects such as Maths, Science, and Art up to a certain level in high school, afterward they can elect their stream based upon their interest and performance.
Further, there is a huge scope of improvement in the preservation of libraries and museums, moreover, the studies of history empower us to be prepared for the future and learn from our past mistakes. Similarly, arts and other traditional subjects allow us to learn to appreciate life. For instance, we revere Van Gauge and Leonardo da Vinci as much as we admire Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein. The world needs great artists and historian no less than it needs scientists and technicians. Thus the government should not neglect the fact that without art and history major there will be no people to work with books and paintings. In addition to this, the government should encourage people to work in art and history fields, also the government should increase the number of job openings in these fields so that people are motivated to pursue their career in non-technical fields.
In conclusion, Art and History are as important as technology and science. To protect our art and culture, we need more people with specialization in these fields as well. The government and the educational institutes must ensure the future prospectus of art and history in order to keep these streams alive.
- some people think that Genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people’s ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 78
- It is generally accepted that exercise is good for children and teenagers. Therefore, physical educationand sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools. What do you think? 61
- Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g. 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...an it needs scientists and technicians. Thus the government should not neglect the f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07880434783 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71279910889 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4038991173 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15583726404 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470920157532 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434543801695 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100663295904 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327369368639 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.