Scientists believe that in order to protect the environment, people must use less energy in their daily lives. However, most people have not changed the way they live. Why do you think many people have not taken individual action? What could be done to encourage them to take action?
Energy demand is soaring as the economies are moving towards innovation and development. Major source of producing energy is by consumption of fossil fuels, that cannot fulfill future demands of this planet. So, according to scientific studies, to preserve our mother earth humanity should use energy judiciously. However, the action required by this generation to save fuel is not encouraging. This paragraph will discuss why we have failed to take much initiative and what will be the source of inspiration to take future action.
Firstly, we as mass consumers of this energy in the form of electricity and fuel are affected by shortsightedness as we prioritize personal interests over society or national goals. In addition to this central and state governments have no clear directive of minimizing the dependence on major fuels. Therefore, no mechanism is set up to charge penalty for wastage of energy. This has lead to easy availability of power and masses have forgotten the value of energy. For example, according to recent study by National Pollution Board, there was 50% increase in fuel consumption on traffic lights as drivers avoid shutting off the engine.
Secondly, savings on this limited resource should be inculcated in primary school curriculum. Energy efficient alternatives should be promoted in a way that general public understands long term life effects, if we run out of generating energy. One way of making it viable is by choosing energy ambassadors from each province who can drive the mindset of putting less stress on this globe by effective use of digital platforms. To cite an example, by installing LED technology as compared to traditional one, we can show the monthly savings on usage of one mega watt of electricity.
To conclude, self awareness is missing among many that we cannot tread long in our power needs if we do not change our habits. However, it is possible by consciously involving everyone we can drive the transformation in our actions and lead towards a safer and healthy planet.
- Scientists believe that in order to protect the environment people must use less energy in their daily lives However most people have not changed the way they live Why do you think many people have not taken individual action What could be done to encoura 72
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping. Is this a negative or positive development? 73
- Many people are choosing to find information online rather than in books Is this development positive or negative 49
- The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills To what extent do you agree 59
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...atives should be promoted in a way that general public understands long term life effects, if ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13554216867 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91489553535 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6918916139 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118240772859 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380603136977 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274029506442 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701039236788 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262668116069 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.