Some people believe that children can learn effectively by watching TV and they should be encouraged to watch TV both at home and school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that watching TV which is cheered to do at home and also school can provide a wide range of knowledge for children. Although I agree that children can get productively study through television, I think that there are some drawbacks of this issue. In this essay, I will show the reasons why.
On the one hand, kids can easily understand knowledge and have an effective acquisition by watching TV. Those difficult learning are not complicated any more thanks to many interesting videos via Youtube. Besides that, keeping an eye on TV can also assess their curiosity, making them want to know more about things surrounding us. From that point, at the age which is still rather young, they could improve and practice the ability of perception promptly. Moreover, there are plenty of useful and valuable videos relating to educated purposes that were created for children only. For example, the Youtube Kids app, which most parents and their children can find many academic videos including not only practical but also entertaining lessons.
On the other hand, not all of the programs that are screened on television are helpful. On the Internet these days, a huge number of sensitive videos were covered and it is too dangerous to let kids watch those videos. As it may bring to children negative thoughts or even indecent insights, which lead to having bad humour and going through a harsh stage of maturity. Moreover, watching TV both at home and school can also distract them, then causing an awful influence on their studying. Instead of watching TV, parents should let them try to take part in recreational activities and play sports. It not only creates physical movement but also makes children feel good because their bodies produce endorphins. Therefore, the learning efficiency of children will be developed. Additionally, kids may have eye strains when looking at TV too much and cause eye disease later.
In conclusion, watching TV is not faulty but needing a parent's observation, so that parents can control the time as well as consider the content of videos for their kids.
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010 95
- Some people think that with the increasing use of mobile phones and computers people lose the ability to communicate face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that getting old is a negative thing whereas others think it is much easier for people to live in modern society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ning lessons. On the other hand, not all of the programs that are screened on televisio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... too much and cause eye disease later. In conclusion, watching TV is not faulty...
^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...watching TV is not faulty but needing a parents observation, so that parents can contro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0113960114 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6016185515 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595441595442 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3758351 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7222222222 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320132781666 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920726102204 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885159360153 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195727717394 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668353964167 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.