In the recent era, people all around the world are science and technology-oriented. Parents emphasize teaching their children those subjects that have a technological background by thinking about the industrial sector and the betterment of their future. Nevertheless, some people think that learning music in school is vital for the student for maturity and humanity, while others believe that it is nothing but a waste of time and assets. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.
To begin with the former view, according to the sociologist humanity among the people is shrinking at a faster rate. To keep it alive the importance of music can not be described in words. Firstly, music can bring people to one place, which is very useful to make a friendship among the people and for cognitive skills. For instance, research of the Music Science Institute of Oxford University showed that music helps pupils develop their brains and balance their workload. Moreover, music makes people more self-confident as well as it works as a medicine when people fall into frustration and gives them mental satisfaction. Furthermore, learning music gives people the opportunity to make a good career in the future.
On the other hand, many people go against the statement because they think that music can break their attention and make them emotional which is harmful to their academic career. In addition, if the student attends the musical class, it will be hard for them to study more on other subjects. Despite that, if the students do some technological courses and learn the particle skills in schools which will help them in the job sectors and make a better future. As technology advances, a huge number of job opportunities are created every year.
In conclusion, to sum up, all the points above, for the survival of humanity music is necessary but from my perspective, I will go with the latter statement.
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 14
- The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below 74
- In some cultures the old age is highly valued while in some cultures youth is highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09538461538 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82448131071 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.391264577 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261756912329 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823636171191 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583134112999 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14984946625 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643527256812 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.