Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Throughout a student’s acquisition period from tertiary level to universities, a fair amount of time is spent on learning theoretical facts and not ample efforts have been concentrated on functional curriculums. Although know-how of the basis of a particular major is beneficial, I firmly insist that pupils should be more familiarized with practical aspects of the theories.
Unique to second level education in myriad of schools around the world, is the significance of paying a close attention on how a particular arithmetic problem is solved or where momentous theories are based on. This, if is been placed a consecutive emphasis on, would have negative impacts on learners, culminating in their less fondness to gain extra information on those subjects, consequently. Iranian schools, as a salient instance, share too much theoretical-based information on a specific topic to their students. Had they not been obliged to learn overwhelming otherwise useless problems, in some cases, students could have been able to be more engaged with practical aspects of their major and would be more satisfied with their education period now. Hence, making students to memorize all the details of a theory do not necessarily assure that they will be more competent in their prospective career.
Another point to consider is that students had better gain preliminary experience to be more appropriately engaged with their future company in which they might have been recruited. The Significance of the functional skills they are being instructed, not surprisingly, is more comprehended. The generous number of Western institutions, for instance, provides their educators with an internship opportunity to work in renowned companies in their corresponding majors. In this way, not only do students gain a valuable experience during their internship, but also they can investigate their aptitude in their major and decide if they want to continue their course and obtain higher qualifications.
To recapitulate, although learning basic facts and theories of a specific subject is deemed to be indispensable, this should not be overrated and other experimental and practical-based experiences should be more privileged among learners.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this. 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views an 84
- Some people think that children should learn to compete, but others think that they should be taught to cooperate with others. What’s your opinion? 56
- Do you think a museum is to educate or entertain people? 89
- Nowadays more and more people are spending less time at home.Why do you think it happens?What effect does this have on individuals and the society? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to overwhelm'.
Suggestion: to overwhelm
...nts. Had they not been obliged to learn overwhelming otherwise useless problems, in some cas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, second, so, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58235294118 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28371650994 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4818400695 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.166666667 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110656001535 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439965843725 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537769214821 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840372524082 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557550713458 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.