Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture and character from their choice of clothes. Do you agree or disagree?

It is believed by some people that character of a person can be adjudged through the clothes he/she prefers to wear. In my opinion, nature, culture and profession of a person is reflected from their outfit. Therefore, one should choose his/her clothes wisely.

In India, people generally wear some kind of accessories that demonstrate their respective religions. For instance, a
Sikh man can be seen sporting a turban whereas a Muslim man prefers a skull cap. Apart from showcasing the religions, a dress can also act as a mirror to a man's profession. To illustrate this, a suit is usually seen on sales executives and person wearing shabby clothes can be easily identified as a factory worker. Although, a person's outfit tells a lot about his/her personality, a lot of facts about his nature are still hidden from the external world.

It is also recommended to wear clothes according to the occasion in order to avoid becoming laughing stock of a gathering.
As an illustration, you don't wear pajamas in a corporate party as you might end up being the central attraction of that particular function. To avoid this, It's always advisable to be aware of your surroundings. However, trends are now shifting and people are now gradually moving to casual clothes from formal outfits. This particular change is the result of famous personalities promoting tank tops and ripped jeans instead of formal shirts and pants.

To conclude, it is true that choice of clothes define a man's profession, culture and character. Thus, one should dress wisely in order to alleviate his social stature and becoming successful.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir respective religions. For instance, a Sikh man can be seen sporting a turban w...
^^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: LAUGHING_STOCK[1]
Message: Did you mean 'laughingstock'?
Suggestion: laughingstock
...the occasion in order to avoid becoming laughing stock of a gathering. As an illustration, yo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f a gathering. As an illustration, you dont wear pajamas in a corporate party as yo...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, apart from, for instance, kind of, in my opinion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06741573034 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83107422605 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5041608806 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202640546609 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620414859586 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645427432403 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915544806589 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057950975681 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.