Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree.
Arts is an integral segment of our lives that exhibits the development of a country. While many has opposed the government spending on sculptures,music and arts, I think it is necessary requirement to ensure creativity stays in our lives.
Supporters of the idea believe that government is unnecessarily investing money on arts. The same funds can be diverted to frutiful activities and important sectors of the country. For example, more roads, highways, hospitals, schools can be built wich will enhance economy of the country. Additionally, it will generate employment for the people and modernization of the country in terms of industrial automation. These people think that arts is an expensive and a luxury affair that many governments can not afford spending money on it. Hence, it is recommended to route such funds to more needy and important sectors of the country.
On the opposite side, investments on arts promotion is equally vital for the growth of the society. For example, some governments have established dedicated art schools to improve cognitive and imaginative abilities in the student. And, one could be an architect or civil engineer for the country after studying ancient sculptures and arts from these schools. Moreover, art galleries are a good tourist spots and it attract people from all over the world. By showing rare and famous paintings from the history, decent monetary benefits can be made which will be part of the country's GDP.
Therefore, it is clear that the regime spending money on arts is not a futile investment. In my opinion, it is beneficial for both society and people, and encouraging such investment will only attract further investment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-20 | dalexphilips | 73 | view |
- Write a letter to the manager of the television station In your letter Explain why you do not like the current programs Describe what kind of programs you would like to see instead Explain why these programs are better 86
- Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 75
- You have lost an item of value on a train. Write a letter to the railway company. In your letterDescribe the itemExplain where and when you left itSay what action you would like the company to take. 56
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree 25
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? What measures? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 147, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , music
...ed the government spending on sculptures,music and arts, I think it is necessary requi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more roads, highways, hospitals, schools can be built wich will enhance economy o...
^^
Line 4, column 519, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to spend'.
Suggestion: to spend
...ir that many governments can not afford spending money on it. Hence, it is recommended t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'attracts'?
Suggestion: attracts
...lleries are a good tourist spots and it attract people from all over the world. By show...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22710622711 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94158580506 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4341761653 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200986726552 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673309505562 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543197573623 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108516053497 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038990169735 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.