For decades, the nation's financial condition has always remained disputable among certain demographics of society. These people claim that wealthy nations cannot make their citizens happier with the extra money. This essay will argue that people are always pleased with money no matter what.
Nationals of the affluent country are never bothered about their incomes. They mostly need money to have a party, drinking or for paying rents if one lives in a rented house. Even if someone is not working they can easily opt for centrelink and get their needs fulfilled. Those people who do not plan their future they invest all the money on useless stuff. The more one gets the more they have fun. A research study shows that 30 percent in Australia are not content with extra wealth. They believe money cannot buy happiness but can only be achieved through good connections, friends, colleagues and environment.
On the other hand, people have always been concerned about their source of income and its pay rates. They are justifiably worried about their better future and the family commitments. Additional finance can help them secure their objectives such as buying a house in a beautiful location, getting a luxurious car as well as raising children and their expenses. A research conducted in Canada shows that out of 100, 80 people are more content in work after bonus payments. Hence, shows more productivity, efficiency, positivity, and profitability in the working environment.
In conclusion, it can clearly be observed that extra money can have better influence along the citizens in terms of work and personal life. It's not only encouraging them to grow but also getting toward more developed environments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... nations financial condition has always remain disputable among certain demographic of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs fulfilled" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'fulfilling' or 'to be fulfilled'.
Suggestion: fulfilling; to be fulfilled
... opt for centrelink and get their needs fulfilled. Those people who do not plan their fut...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19636363636 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5566920777 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8295603463 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0588235294 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0892928961531 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314265631966 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318330074468 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597471708159 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357438162802 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.