It is a worldwide concern that many people are still starving despite the agricultural advances and achievements. There are various causes to this situation, and everyone is bound to find solutions.
The reasons can be tracked among natural conditions, disputes between nations and poor measures taken by some authorities. Some areas are facing the severe soil degradation and can harvest little from crops in many Africa countries. Besides, due to disputes over territory and religious issues, endless wars have forced farmers to flee from their homeland, which can be seen in Syria as an example. Some authorities should be blamed too for their poor management on the irrigation systems or the facilities to prevent flood damage.
In terms effective solutions, the leading countries in the world should take main responsibilities on their shoulder to offer help. Countries need to cooperate to reduce the damage to whole environment, like cutting the emission of carbon dioxide. To avoid increasing disputes between nations, it would be a good try to establish diplomatic relationships with the two rivals and offer economic hand or investment if necessary. For some governments that care little about the infrastructural facilities, international entrepreneurs can be introduced to help with the construction with certain interests.
China has managed to be a good example to get people out of poor supply of food and poverty. Measures like establishing irrigation systems, building dams to prevent the frequent flood, and setting up direct contact between the big cities and poor towns have been proved effective measures.
In conclusion, in order to solve the problems of people going hungry in the world, it requires the sincere efforts from each country.
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog. 78
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97349666549 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1317970586 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84615384615 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173745601476 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057441872118 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438729085396 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971943175844 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497136497678 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.