Despite making strides in agriculture advancement, a large number of people suffer starving. I believe that many reasons are responsible for it, two of which are unfair technology distribution and wealthy people's consumerism.
Almost all technologies are found in affluent countries. Although we live in a technology-focused world, all people, especially poor people, do not access them. Therefore, starving would be eradicated if the undeveloped countries were equipped with high-end cultivating tools. On the other hand, these equipment are just manufactured by wealthy and industrialized countries, so tackling this problem is dependent on their determination. For instance, a country like England that achieved success in producing genetically modified foods can share its facilities and knowledge with a country like Uganda that suffered starvation to alleviate this problem.
Consumerism in rich countries has become a big problem for emerging countries. In spite of the production of massive amounts of crops, many people consume more than their needs. It is a shame that they waste a lot of food every year. However, many people succumb each year due to hungry-related illnesses. While if the affluent nations consume food properly, there will undoubtedly be more food for the less prosperous countries. For example, the traditional American celebration is known Super bowl, where people waste vast amounts of food and beverages yearly. At the same time, they could use this food to survive many people in other places in the world.
In conclusion, technology could play a crucial role in alleviating poverty provided that impoverished countries have access to them, and also people wasting food should change their approach to consuming food.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 92
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ing strides in agriculture advancement, a large number of people suffer starving. I believe that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...d cultivating tools. On the other hand, these equipment are just manufactured by wealthy and in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54850746269 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06935816871 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1576080818 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173383419508 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566599700764 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449689422985 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927038939036 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467307233562 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.