In modern scenario, unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. Mobile phones play an indispensable role in everyone’s life. Numerous intellectual individuals consider that adolescents should not be permitted mobile phones at educational institutions. According to my perception, electronic gadgets can distract teenagers and make them spontaneously negligent towards their academics.
Commencing the discussion, numerous people have a perception that mobile phones should not be allowed to juveniles at schools. Firstly, children demonstrate spurious utilisation of cellular phones at school and deliberately become negligent towards their studies. Moreover, children get encouragement to watch obscene videos and pictures due to lack sexual immorality. In addition to this, mobile phones also make them standard conscious and develop a negative sense of superiority. For instance, numerous students become tremendously competitive to purchase high tech and extremely expensive mobile phones. Thus, they bother their parents to buy latest phones for them irrespective of their budget.
Further elucidating my perspective, electronic gadgets like mobile phones can cause catastrophic damages as well as detrimental effects on adolescents. Firstly, perpetuate utilisation of mobile devices impact their eye sight and cause diverse mental disorders as well as behavioural modifications. Besides, they become extremely stubborn and adamant towards parents and teachers. Moreover, they would spend enormous amount of time playing games and lose the significance of enjoying the classroom environment and classmates. For instance, innumerable adolescents keep themselves busy with mobile phones and ignore lively conversations.
To recapitulate, mobile phones play a remarkable role in everyone’s life. Comprehensibly, electronic gadgets can prove horrendous for children at schools due to lack of maturity and innocent minds. Hence, teenagers should refrained from carrying mobile phones to various educational institutions.
- Some people think that to be successful you need to get in university education whereas others say it is not true Discuss both ideas and give your own opinion 79
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars 78
- These days children tend to spend a great deal of time playing computer games Some believe this is a beneficial trend while others think it is detrimental 61
- More and more companies are allowing employee to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 87
- Nowadays some buildings such as offices and schools have open space design instead of separate rooms Why is it so Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'buy the latest'.
Suggestion: buy the latest
...nes. Thus, they bother their parents to buy latest phones for them irrespective of their b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...r them irrespective of their budget. Further elucidating my perspective, electronic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...lisation of mobile devices impact their eye sight and cause diverse mental disorders as w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.43010752688 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27788702735 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605734767025 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6218938005 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218458369779 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716555195591 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065471586628 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145633128744 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393990307993 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.41 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.72 12.4159519038 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.