People tend to move from large family to small. Nowadays, it has been observed that people chooses to be happy in a small family rather than large family. Though one enjoys privacy and more savings in small family, however it cannot compensate the sublime happiness of staying with everyone in a closed relation.
In a small family, one takes the advantage of privacy and more savings. In contrast to a large family where we are in constant guidance of our elders, people from small families tends to enjoys privacy where no one intervenes. Apart from this, for a small family savings is more since one does not have to contribute for family daily spendings. For example, newly married couple always found complaining about privacy as they are always occupied with the members in case of a large family. One more example is people find to have proper future savings in case of a small families. Therefore, in small families’ benefits one of having more of me time andmore monetary investments rather than large families.
Even though being in small family witness its own advantages, I feel disadvantages in a small family outweighs its advantages. People in a small family wont be able to witness how it feels to be under the shelter of love and care of elders. Moreover, a small family do not teach us the feeling of living happily with everyone. It is seen people living in small family becomes more self centred and forget to value, care for others. In my understanding, people do not enjoy the constant love, support and care of elders in a small family.
It has been seen that people tends to be heavily satisfied with being in a small family. Even though a small family provides one with ample space and savings but it cannot compensate the abstract quality of being happy in a large family. To conclude, I feel small family does not provide the happiness of staying with everyone under a single roof though one may find themselves satisfied with money and privacy in a small family.
- In recent years , many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development ? 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that that should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 73
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- there has been several complaints about the reception area where visitors to your company arrive. Your manager has asked you to suggest how the reception area could be improved. write a letter to your managerin your letter:describe the complaints that hav 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'enjoy'.
Suggestion: enjoy
...rs, people from small families tends to enjoys privacy where no one intervenes. Apart ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'family'?
Suggestion: family
...roper future savings in case of a small families. Therefore, in small families' ben...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, therefore, apart from, for example, i feel, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79538904899 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4950515352 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438040345821 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6707698752 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8823529412 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399951881394 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167146394561 0.084324248473 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933479096657 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27800036259 0.151304729494 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068234417315 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.