These days , in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools
What are the reasons for this, how could the problem be solved
The decreased popularity of teaching profession is an area of increasing concern in the society. Insufficient financial incentives, as well as the job market saturation, are few among various factors that trigger this decline. There are some policies which could be implemented to promote the professional teaching again in the community.
Unfortunate as it may seem, we currently live in a world enveloped with the absolute materialism. Even though working as a lecturer can earn heaps of respect and recognition, but low income, people prefer to opt for the jobs which give them sufficient financial stability. Therefore, the sacred employment has lost its glory in the furious race of money-oriented minds. Another principal reason for not choosing the teaching as a career is the availability of less job opportunities. The invasion of technology in the education sector has completely changed the conventional ways of teaching, the automation reduced the demand of employees in the respective sector. Hence, the potential candidates are deciding to try their luck elsewhere rather than struggling to find an employment as a professor.
There is almost certainly no one solution to this problem given the complexity of its causes. However, one option must be to improve the salary packages, flexible retirement plans and other monetary help programs for the teachers to attract more talent by promising them to address their financial problems. It would also be possible to limit the involvement of technology in educational institute to mitigate its harmful impact on the availability of jobs. A successful example of this the Institute of Engineering and Technology, Denmark, where the students are required to complete their assignments and all the educational tasks by using the conventional paper based material.
In conclusion, the teaching as a profession has undoubtedly lost its fame because of inadequate financial support and the scarcity of the employment chances. The situation can be treated by providing adequate economical support and alleviate the reasons of job-cuts in the education department.
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- Prevention is better thn cure. Out of country's health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education n preventive measure. Agree or disagree?? 67
- Prevention is better thn cure. Out of country's health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education n preventive measure. Agree or disagree?? 78
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 91
- Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth’s natural resources. Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste. Others argue that school is the best place to teach do t 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 210, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...on can be treated by providing adequate economical support and alleviate the reasons of jo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51070336391 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14550931978 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611620795107 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7807143962 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.133333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094879484158 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290180086745 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272807074258 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0536042328575 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012595188748 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.