We have been living in the nuelear age now for over half a century. Since the first atomic bombs were developed, nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet. Yet the technology has been put to positive use as an energy source and in certain areas of medicine.
To what extent is nuclear technology a danger to life on Earth? What are the benefits and risks associated with its use?
Being a human being of nuclear era, we are blessed with extensive innovation of technology that is nuclear power. As soon as it was invented, power, having enough ability of take life of entire planet, has been handed over to government body, but they always used it with a positive approach to bringing development towards civilization. This essay will discuss how negatively it can create impact on entire survivals of the Earth and also share the positive points and few risks of using it.
Let's come to the giant impact of this technology. It has power to turn Earth into a lifeless planet. We are all aware of the biggest incident happen in Hiroshima and Nagashaki which ruined the complete sign of life. They are still suffering from various issues in current days. Babies are taking birth with an array of health issues and physical disabilities. It was created enormous effect to soil and water both. As a result, people are unable to grow required grains or vegetables for cooking in order to lead the daily life. In short, nuclear power has unimaginable bad impacts against humanity.
Moving on the to positive points and risks. We are implementing this power source to bring positive changes from various aspects. Huge progression has been incorporated in agriculture field, medical science and industries to reduce the large amount of human effort. Nowadays, medical science becomes stronger enough to beat any life taking disease. So that people can be cured as much as possible. But one must have intensive knowledge of perfect percentage of application of this power source in order to reduce the risk involved it.
In conclusion, nuclear power can bring visible improvements towards human life with the positive application.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-20 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
- Write about the following topic Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for world poverty How can the poor be helped Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant ex 61
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... points and few risks of using it. Lets come to the giant impact of this techno...
^^^^
Line 9, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...enough to beat any life taking disease. So that people can be cured as much as possible...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, in conclusion, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09722222222 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63368456108 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5378014184 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5555555556 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163447517558 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427769371393 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509533154846 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103003590829 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703525489605 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.