In terms of wealth, the gap between developed countries and developing countries has been increasing. How reduction this gap, and whether or not 1st world countries must assist 3rd countries' achievement of prosperity, were always questioned.
The first world countries are known as self-sufficient nations, so the first step to mitigating this gap is reaching independence. Therefore, so long as countries depend on financial aid, it’s arduous to get out of the cycle. By knowing what causes lead a country to be the 3rd world country, can be useful to exit this trap; these countries are suffering from a low Gross Domestic Product, high illiteracy rate, medical facilities inefficient and unsustainable government debt. For instance, the government by relying on national capitals and resources and nurturing the expert forces by providing the scholarships for students and applying their knowledge can elevate the GDP rate. Furthermore, they must be able to change their culture, for example, the high birth rate is one of the reasons to be the 3rd world country. Therefore, the fate of any country has not been changed unless by their nation.
Unfortunately, every country thinks only to its benefits and prefer to make other countries dependence to its. Indeed, the developed countries will not help to the developing countries, except for the exploitation, they give a loan to poor-countries and make them indebted and consequence, they would face with the budget deficit and direct them to the worse situation. To my mind, the rich-states must assist the poor-states by the transfer the knowledge and bring up professional human resource instead of the financial helping. Hence, to create balance in the world, countries must have cooperation by sharing technology.
By progress knowledge and increasing riches, the difference between developed and developing nations has more revealed. Knowing the roots of this problem can provide convenient solutions to alleviate this split, including adopting the forward culture and counting on their abilities. In my opinion, countries must neglect the borders and helping to develop each other to achieve a better world.
- All students ought to study art and music in school To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Many countries spend a lot of money on art Some people think investment in art is necessary but other say money is better spent in improving health and education Discuss both views and give your opinion
- Nowadays people use social media to keep in touch with others and be aware of news Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 44
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind such as reading and doing word puzzles Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...increasing. How reduction this gap, and whether or not 1st world countries must assist 3rd cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...not 1st world countries must assist 3rd countries achievement of prosperity, were always ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...o its benefits and prefer to make other countries dependence to its. Indeed, the develope...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, except for, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39411764706 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97529621101 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582352941176 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5635033291 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.266666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5078339449 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170146408804 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108830998687 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328146696834 0.151304729494 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117641983912 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.