Some people ague that intended purpose is the wholly significant consideration in term of designing new buildings regardless its’ outlook. Personally, I disagree with this perspective. The reasons for it are twofold.
On the one hand, there is a variety of backgrounds why people are solely keen on the intended use of the properties. Firstly, it gives the households an easier access to cut cost and save time of the buildings. Undeniably, thanks to ignoring the appearance of the estates, both designing and construction works would be more smoothly processed. Therefore, the budget of duration and expenditures are considerably reduced. Secondly, these days, some modern blocks are for specific uses, are required to be built with limited materials, let them alone of meeting the demand of surface decoration. For example, when designing warehouses, hardly designers well combine both the sufficient functions and making end meets of beauty.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that the outward faces of the building is by no mean inessential. initially, it respects the common image of local areas. In fact, many skyscapers built without following the traditional concept of the locality, become eyesores. In other words, they damage the typical of cultural construction heritage of the located cities. Moreover, good outlooks, somewhere, cultivate the main function of the building. Let ‘s take Sapa - a old city in Northern Vietnam - as a stark example, had it not been for the policy of local authority that requires not only new houses but shops in local areas to be designed in consistence with traditional looks, the city would have never remain their reputation for architecture to the pick of attracting millions of visitors coming and shopping each year.
By the way of conclusion, why accepting the importance of intended use of building, I reckon that their outward appearances are equally important when forming ideas at designing stage.
- You missed an appointment. Write a letter explaining what happened. In your letter include:what the appointment wasa apology for missing the appointmenta request to reschedule 56
- You’ve just moved into a new house and found out that your furniture has been damaged by the removal company. Write to the manager of this company and say– Give you details.– Explain what happened and when.– What you think should be done about the 78
- Some think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe one can get any information or advice from the Internet or books.Discuss both the views and give your own opinion. 84
- You are renting a new apartment, but your family situation has changed recently. Write a letter to the real estate agent asking them to find a new accommodation, more suitable for your needs.In your letter explain – your current family situation. What t 61
- You missed an appointment. Write a letter explaining what happened. In your letter include:what the appointment wasa apology for missing the appointmenta request to reschedule 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Initially
...the building is by no mean inessential. initially, it respects the common image of local ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f the building. Let 's take Sapa - a old city in Northern Vietnam - as a sta...
^
Line 5, column 710, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...tional looks, the city would have never remain their reputation for architecture to th...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ors coming and shopping each year. By the way of conclusion, why accepting ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, i reckon, in fact, by the way, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3536977492 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93674357755 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639871382637 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.2376764866 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170411499129 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468886353701 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633510626213 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123527889914 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741982727365 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.