2) Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Almost everybody can remember of a special teacher even if they are from childhood. This is because educators play an important hole in our lives which is not only to teach but also inspire students with their examples and advice. I agree with the statement that teacher’s ability to get along with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject. I fell this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, all professions require from their aplicants remarkable skills and deep knowledge. It is the minimum that each worker should prove no matter the field of work they are being part with. Similarly, the professors should possess ineffable skills and knowledge that are expected for their jobs but only this is not sufficient to make a great and special teacher for students. For instance, in a job interview if all curriculums are in the same level the differential is the personality of each individual and the way that they respond to the everyday tasks.
Secondly, the main function of an educator is to identify the challenges of each student and provide them with the right approach, therefore, they would be able to overcome their limitations and fears. Furthermore, having the ability to relate well with the students permit the professor to gain confidence and respect from the classroom, thus generating an environment of mutual reliance which enhance the process of teaching and learning. For example, into the classroom the teacher should identify the students that are encountering difficulties in learning and concentrating and refer them to the right professional, such as psychologist or tutor, after talking to them.
To sum up, I strongly agree that get along with the students is the pivotal factor in the process of teaching and learning instead of only posses deep knowledge. This is because professors as well as other professionals are expected to have skills and because the main function of teachers is to identify student’s challenges and stimulate them to overcome it. Moreover the ability to relate well is the goal that all teachers should pursue.
- TPO - writing integrated taskSummarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - Turtle Excluder Device (TED) 86
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone.Which do you prefer? 70
- Jumping Young Salmon Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories presented in the reading passage 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 70
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...nges and stimulate them to overcome it. Moreover the ability to relate well is the goal ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16326530612 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85758014146 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504373177843 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4366409357 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 5.45110844103 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321654994017 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114794521244 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151858261808 0.0737576698707 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204924641095 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123446833965 0.0645574589148 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.