In the modernization and globalization world, a car is the most useful innovation; however, it causes several troubles in our society. Some people may say that large city should ban cars from the city center and others disagree. However, from my vintage point, I firmly believe cars should ban from the city center for the following significant reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that a car causes the most prominent issue of traffic in a downtown of metro city. Indeed, a car makes life more convenient and one can reach to the destination within a short span of time, though it causes many traffic problems and people have to stuck in their cars for hours. Apparently, the center of a town is a hub for employees and everyone uses a car, this makes city crowded with cars. If the car usage will be stopped then the issue of traffic would be solved and people would able save their time as a time is money in the competitive world. For example, my husband works in the downtown of Atlanta, his office is 9 miles away from our home. However, during the office hours when everyone wants to reach office, it takes him 1 hr. to get his office and the same thing at the time of returning from his work. Hence, cars should be stopped to save time.
Another reason that deserves some words is that usage of public transportation will increase in this scenario. Everyone is aware about benefits of public vehicles. In fact, government will improve tax revenue with the usage of public vehicles instead of private cars. With the help of trains and buses, one can help environment, as cars are major source of air pollution and greenhouse gases. Moreover, the safety of people is also associated with usage of private vehicles. Few days back, I read one survey about New York City, everyday 25 people become victims of car accidents in NYC, most of them are visitors from foreign countries. In order to improve public safety the ban is essential. How one can forget about the world’s leading issue of oil conservation which can be easily solved by a usage of public transportation. It may not create a huge impact on saving fuel but it will help to reserve fuels for few more years. Thus, our society will get a great help from this ban.
The noteworthy interesting research conducted in our countries shows seventy percent people believe the usage of car should be stopped in the city center. Doubtlessly, the problem of car parking would solve and those parking spaces can be used for improvement of our society like museums, parks, a library etc.
In the conclusion, I wisely think the usage of car should ban in the center of city, not only helps it to solve traffic issues but also to improve utility of public transportation. This small change will bring several advancements in our community.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and support your answers with examples 93
- TPO 17 integrated essay 80
- A Gift (such As A Camera, A Soccer Ball Or An Animal) Can Contribute To A Child`s Development. What Gift Would You Give To Help A Child Develop? Why? Use Reasons And Specific Examples To Support Your Choice. 90
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources such as forests animals or clean water Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 81
- Is It More Important To Be Able To Work With A Group Of People On A Team Or To Work Independently? Use Reasons And Specific Examples To Support Your Answer. 90
is that usage of public transportation will increase in this scenario.
is that the usage of public transportation will increase in this scenario.
can be used for improvement of our society
can be used for the improvement of our society
not only helps it to solve traffic issues but also to improve utility of public transportation.
Description: 'Not only...but also' is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 494 350
No. of Characters: 2262 1500
No. of Different Words: 237 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.714 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.579 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.441 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.895 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.298 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.49 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5