The rules are the boundaries that are made to limit different activities. Society rules are made to control activities of different parts of community and young people are the main parts of community so, it is prudent to say that rules are too strict..? Two diverse perspective immerse while meticulously evaluating this issue one perspective answers the aforementioned question in affirmative with utmost conviction while other disagree. I strongly agree that today's rules are strict. There are two major rules made by community are acting as hurdle for youngsters.
First rule is regarding lifestyle, Everyone's life should be like good education, job and then marriage, home, kids then retirement. Some youngster are not made for this way of living they choose their own path something like this. education, business, being single and travel a lot. while some young artist are really not in to education they needed to spend time on their art rather than job and money. This is the main reason that artist are struggling lot while some hesitate to choose this path only because of 'what they will say' ? One study showed that some are forced to get education in which they are not interested this leads to depression and ultimately suicide cases are increasing.
Another rule is about marriage, One has to marry as per parents wish and if a boy or girl chooses their life-partner on their own then it must be of same status as well as same cast. Youngsters have different mentality they see compatibility first. They try to choose their better half from their surroundings and some prefer to live together without marriage. Previously girl and boy were not allowed to meet or even see each other before marriage. This drastic change is certainly not bearable by community. Traditional rules and thoughts of community are against it concept of honor killing came up because this rule. Generation wise thought process has evolved lot so these rules seems very strict for young people.
These rule enable the way of unhappy living and personally I have proclivity towards thought that we get life only once and we have to utilize it to live as per our wish.
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
- he widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world? 70
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 40
- Setting up library to avoild petty theft 50
- Pets should be treated like family members. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...prudent to say that rules are too strict..? Two diverse perspective immerse while ...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Education
...se their own path something like this. education, business, being single and travel a lo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...usiness, being single and travel a lot. while some young artist are really not in to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, regarding, so, then, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95867768595 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5981749793 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3429720359 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7368421053 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168039220181 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05843661785 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953406678168 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102939351259 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103411249772 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.