Some people believe that honesty is the most important factor in any relationship between people. However, in my opinion, I do not agree with the idea and I think sometimes telling a lie can be helpful to keep a relationship between people. I would like to explain and support my idea with some examples as follows.
First, telling a white lie is sometimes needed not to destroy a relationship between friends. The white lie is helpful to encourage people to have confidence and is imperative not to hurt people’s minds. For example, when we are invited to a friend’s house and served with home cooking dishes, we have to say good words to the dishes, even though they are not delicious. This is regarded as a basic manner. Also, when children ask us about Santa Claus, we cannot be honest that he is a fake one and the Christmas presents are from parents.
Second, being silent is the most effective way to keep a good relationship between people in many cases, not always telling the truth. Sometimes, it is difficult for us to judge which is better between telling a truth or a white lie. So, when we have no idea on the exact situation, we are recommended to be quiet on the issue. For instance, one of my best friends in my university seemed to have two girlfriends at the same time, and one of the girlfriends asked me to tell the truth for sure. However, I did not confirm anything to her, because I did not want to be involved in their relationship, but wanted to keep a good relationship with my friend.
To sum up, telling the truth directly sometimes can hurt other people’s minds and also can cause a serious misunderstanding while it is forwarded wrongly to the listener. In this regard, I disagree with “always telling the truth”, but agree that telling a white lie or being silent in some cases are needed for peaceful relationships between people.
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 68
- marco polo 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 52
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 71
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in many cases, in my opinion, in some cases, to sum up, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66066066066 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73700290072 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498498498498 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8223250467 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.45110844103 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341390411433 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123941552802 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130474881628 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218568162809 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688707258709 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.