The reading states that there are several reasons that sending people to an asteroid would be the best colonization option. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refutes them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity, and because of that their landing is safer than landing on the Moon or Mars. On the contrary, the lecturer brings duo the idea that low gravity presents so much risk, such as a health problem. When humans live so long under specific circumstances, the low gravity makes a bad influent on mussels.
Furthermore, the author argues that some asteroids are rich in valuable elements, like metals, gold, and platinum. Conversely, the professor disagrees whit the reading passage, and she states that If trace elements are available to everyone, they will no longer be valuable and can not be used economically.
Finally, the reading passage holds the view that some of the asteroids would be very easy to reach. Since some of them get closer to Earth than our Moon. The speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that maybe some asteroids were near to Earth, but returning from them is not easy at all. Going back from asteroids is quite challenging.
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some t 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The personal and work related challenges that young people face today are not any different from the challenges their parents and grandparents faced when they were young 73
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line The vessel was about 2 200 years old Each clay jay contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod The 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree Governments are doing good in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the reading passage holds the view that some of the asteroids would be very easy to reach. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... asteroids would be very easy to reach. Since some of them get closer to Earth than o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 52.1666666667 42% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 222.0 407.700716846 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90540540541 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4712000734 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 618.680645161 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6108665767 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142428658078 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560881075324 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414366171671 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749149436517 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493699911951 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.