When it comes to the issue the effects of the automobile on quality of life, some people that the automobile has a constructive role in modern life. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account the following reasons.
First and the most important reason is that the automobile makes life comfortable. The cars help people to do their job easily, and increase their welfare. I think that there is not a better example than me when I want to go to a store. I like to go to shopping center once per week, so I have to buy many foods at one time. It is quite normal that I can not carry these amounts of foodstuffs with a crowed subway. In this way, the use of my personal car allows me to put my foods at the back of the car, and came back home with the nice music and happy mood for the shopping.
A further point we must consider is that the use of private cars save our time and energy. As we all know, the modern people tend to do their job as quickly as possible. For achieve this, they constantly tend to innovate new technologies to save time and energy. The automobile is one of modern equipment that helps people to have more time. I think that a small instance can give some light on this matter. If you want to go to another city, you can use of a train, while it may not be flexible with your schedule and you have to spend much time for this travel. On contrary, a private car allows you to travel with your planning, which prevents to waste your time. The times have different means for modern people. It can mean money for businessmen, knowledge for school students and profits for companies.
In contrast, the use of private cars can have some disadvantages such as inactivity. As we all know, we are living in a culture that new technologies lead people to be reluctant to do physical activities. According to this trend, people like to use of private cars even though they want to commute a short path. I admit that the automobile changes our life style and make us inactivity, it is not necessarily to always use of the personal. Sometimes, we can walk or ride a bicycle for going to office or school.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that the automobile makes life continent and save our time. Of course, as an English proverb goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that the use of cars lead people to do not have physical activities. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that its profits outweigh dangerous. Last but not least, I hope that people gain the deeper knowledge that the use of cars does not mean they do not need physical activities.
- Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies? Use specific examples and details to support your response. 79
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High schools should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 80
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 91
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'in contrast', 'of course', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.155913978495 0.158761421928 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0860215053763 0.0866891130778 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0483870967742 0.046263068375 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0770609318996 0.0685040099705 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109318996416 0.118717715034 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0089605734767 0.0351676179071 25% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.52039679416 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0448028673835 0.0309702414327 145% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100358422939 0.0887237588012 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0143369175627 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010752688172 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2743.0 2387.08602151 115% => OK
No of words: 500.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.486 5.86048508987 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.268 0.338922669872 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.202 0.251872472559 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134 0.174417080927 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.088 0.112833075102 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52039679416 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524397521467 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.6693605188 59.2087087015 94% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6684587814 135% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8571428571 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2121606193 48.84282405 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9642857143 120.699889404 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.464285714286 0.644075263715 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 38.0571428571 45.7405998639 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.2101910828 1.45489161554 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2411027886 0.300154397459 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.071286903176 0.103427244359 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0702053407871 0.0752933317313 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.44508850425 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137192730603 0.151897553556 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864931269788 0.114077575197 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919317678395 0.0781384742642 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.411157407186 0.336927656856 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0562639127769 0.067059652881 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1818792774 0.210909579961 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059789703644 0.0618886996521 97% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.