Owing to the rapid change of the society, nowadays many people may find it harder to be happy than before. However, as far as I can see, we are actually much happier than we were in the past. Here are my points.
For one thing, the diverse ways of recreation have dramatically increased in the past few years, which greatly uplift citizens’ spirit. To name an example, when I was a kid I hardly had anything to play in my leisure time. The only pleasure was fighting with my classmates because I was always the winner. By contrast, nowadays not only can we spend our holidays traveling around the globe, but also we are endowed with plenty of online games such as Cross Fire, the Angry Birds and so on, from which we are sure to acquire more joy than fighting with others. As for me, I can bury myself into playing games on my smartphone after work, and then I could forget all the troubles and problems on the campus. According to China Daily, 80% of the interviewees believe that they are prone to feel pleasant after playing various games. Therefore, it is quite safe to say that the appearance of more kinds of recreation enables people to be more satisfied than before.
For another, people today are less likely to suffer from some physical discomfort such as hungry and diseases, attributed by the development of technologies. There is no denying that people who suffer a lot from terrible illness or starvation will by no means feel satisfied. Just think about the people in the past. Before the industrial revolution, agriculture had not advanced sufficiently to support all the people. In addition, the productivity of the crops were largely dependent on the weather, that is, when terrible disasters arise, no one would escape starvation. On the contrary, thanks to the improvement in crop seeding and planting, now we are rather resistant to natural phenomenon, which means that a basic amount of food can be guaranteed no matter what will happen; consequently, we no longer worry about the troubles about hunger. Isn’t it obvious that modern people are more satisfied owing to the elimination of hunger?
To sum it up, people now are more prone to be happy than they were in the past because of less suffering and more approaches of recreation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 80
- People can take care of their family members better when they live in big cities than in the countryside. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, as for, in addition, such as, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7989821883 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66491308425 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559796437659 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9728992622 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261418808831 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762262280243 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827644598767 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188204156474 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838129253609 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.