Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's hectic life it is an astonishing fact that people from all walks of life differ greatly in their attitudes towards this phenomenon. We find that some people prefer to permanent hiring, on the other hand others prefer to negative idea. From my perspective, I would side with the former. So,Let's see my reasons.
Taking the proposed subject into account the reason which may shed some light on my point is about productivity. It goes without saying that as technology advances all over the world we have confronted an extreme competition between corporations at different corners of the world. Therefore, it is essential to have a set of workers who put their concentrations on their tasks. As a matter of fact, we should grope for constant agreement with our employees in order to obviate their primary and fundamental needs.
Another rationale of why I take positive idea about the first perspective in the introductory paragraph is that job security is very important. It is absolutely certain that people at different places are making a lot of efforts to learn different skills besides their own to achieve their career goals or even to assuage their penchant for acquiring favorable wage. As a result, we should provide a safe job opportunity for them. Moreover, in my point of view, we live in a fragile island of life in universe of possibilities and because of that workers tend to reduce their lives' risks.
Nevertheless, the two paragraphs in the body should not be over generalized. Just as an old adage goes:" a coin has two sides", those who take the other side are partially reasonable every once in a while. That is, there might be a situation in which fix commitments can push too much pressure on the company. In fact, it can cause tension on budget and resources and authorities like to agree with temporary employees.
To put it in a nutshell in light of the previously discussed reasons, the viewpoint of those who believe long term obligations has brought more bane than boon is accepted occasionally, though the situation like more pressure on budget is too special and fairly rare that should not be taken as general rule. Indeed, productivity and job security are prime factors to my propensity for choosing a great idea about long term employment. If I could have a chance to be a manager, I do not have a bit of hesitation to do it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
2019-10-22 | gaoxiangluke | 76 | view |
2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
- 32. Which one is better: enjoy money when you earn it or save it for some time in the future? 70
- What change would make your hometown more appealing to people your age? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 65
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- TPO.3-1 60
- TPO.17 60
on the other hand others prefer to negative idea.
on the other hand others may have an opposite idea. //'negative' is not proper here
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 410 350
No. of Characters: 1919 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.5 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.68 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.73 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 97 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.579 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.261 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.269 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.512 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5