A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Factories in a city can influence our lives greatly since they include both positive effects such as increasing the opportunities for work and earn more tax for the town as well as negative effects such as pollution of the environment. Nowadays some people may hold the opinion that if a company desires to spend money for a city, it is more advantageous to spend on arts as if it is a general truth. But to be frank, I cannot concur with them because I strongly believe that the company should spend money on environmental aspects for the following reasons.
Firstly, in that manner companies can diminish the harm that they make. One of the crucial problems a factory is stimulated is pollution of the nature due to diverse harmful gases which it produces. Spending money on the environment drops this effect to a magnificent extent. For instance, Haraz, a food firm in my town, brings about many health troubles such as different diseases since it puts a good deal of Carbon Dioxide gas into the atmosphere. However, harsh government ceased its production as a consequence of this problem and imposed Haraz to upgrade its tools. If the company spends money to assist the environment, it modifies individuals' attitude towards the company and will decrease the pace of poisonous gases.
Secondly, spending money on the environment could assist people to be more well-being. Water pollution is a usual problem in factories which means companies' harmful remains are usually put into a river and cause a lot of illnesses. Aftab is a car company in Pakistan; the existence of this firm is made numerous diseases such as chest cancer for the persons who live near this firm according to Tehran news and individuals can suffer from this problem because they utilize water polluted by this company. As you can see, spending money to make the Earth condition, water pollution for example, finer will help humans to become healthier.
Finally, art is also extremely important for our lives. By using beautiful pictures as well as placards in a city, it looks more beautiful; they help our country to earn more money since beauty attracts more tourists. Moreover, it is a well-known statement that "beauty or something artistic makes people happier". Therefore, people will have a happier life if a company spends money on the art.
In conclusion, although art is chief aspect for a preferable life and helps humans to achieve healthier condition, but it seems to me that spending money on the environment can cause companies profit people more. Not only it will lower the harm that companies are the origin of that, but also it assists people to be healthier. Therefore, if I have a factory, I do not have any doubt about spending money on making the Earth circumstances better.
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment Which do you think the company should choose Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 85
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment Which do you think the company should choose Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94255319149 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75258716114 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6756572891 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.15 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15752933468 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571099107848 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046513905178 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991391040245 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170005368152 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.