Is it that the ability to sustain friendships with a small number of people for happiness for a long time more vital than the one to make many new easily? This is a debatable hot topic. When it comes to the question, people\'s views vary from one to another. Some assert that the later is more significant, while others hold a different view. From my perspective, the ability to sustain friendships consistently is more important.
Undoubtedly, bountiful new friends can make our life more colorful and delighting. Just imagine that wherever we go, we are always surrounded by various friends; whoever we meet, we can make some chat with him. Nearly, we will never feel lonely and our life can be filled with laughter. After all, if we have argued with one, we still can play with others. Moreover, new friends also mean the wider horizontal, which can help us not only gain more information but also confront things multifacetedly. Specifically, when we encounter problems and confusing, if there is merely one friend, the solution can be limited. In contrast, with the presence of a variety of friends, we can gain more suggestions and even sources. To some extent, the argument seems to be perfect. However, we have to stress on one point, that is, we make new friends easily, which can imply quickly and simply and consequently lead to diverse underlying shortages.
Therefore, it is more rewarding to obtain the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. From one angle, it suggests that we may not own lots of friends, but all of our friends have to get along with us for long and experienced a lot, which hints the life along with them can be more comfortable. Having been friends for a long time, each of us gets a good understanding of each other. Not exaggeratedly, even simply one facial expression without speaking, we get the meaning from each other swiftly. Perhaps, we do not laugh all the time, nor can we accompany each other every day. But once each of us meets any problem, we will always beside. Since we know each other well, we can speak everything we want; similarly, we can be silent as long as we want. There is no need for a more explanation. Such a relationship can be warm and optimal.
Furthermore, it is the friend who has been long with us can help us make progress truly. It is they who can be deemed as true friends. Therefore, they will ponder things from our angle. Each time we get trapped in dilemma, they will sincerely secure us, gaining us an accurate solution. On the contrary, as for the easily get friends, it is difficult for them to do so. Moreover, with the process of sustaining the relationship among friends for long, we can get a train and polish from multiple dimensions. After all, it is easy to pretend to be perfect in front of new friends for a short time, but it can be demanding to insist on camouflage for long. Consequently, during the period spent with each other, we are inevitable to showcase our weakness; then we can revise and make progress.
Everyone has his own ideas; meanwhile, as an old saying goes,\' Each coin has two sides.\' In consequence, it is impossible for me to absolutely contend that my option is the best one and force people to reach a consensus on the issue. It is, just for me, I am prone to take the ability to maintain a friendship for long as a priority.
- The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago it caused much concern because sea otte 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 80
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...the ability to sustain friendships with a small number of people for happiness for a long time mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. From one angle,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , \
... ideas; meanwhile, as an old saying goes,\ Each coin has two sides.\ In consequenc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, after all, as for, even so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2786.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 603.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62023217247 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69125974715 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475953565506 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 27.0 9.59856630824 281% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2016381552 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4242424242 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247690343671 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084366238371 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111149761874 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177699379895 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790833965197 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...the ability to sustain friendships with a small number of people for happiness for a long time mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. From one angle,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , \
... ideas; meanwhile, as an old saying goes,\ Each coin has two sides.\ In consequenc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, after all, as for, even so, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 9.8082437276 245% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2786.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 603.0 407.700716846 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62023217247 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9554069778 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69125974715 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475953565506 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 27.0 9.59856630824 281% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2016381552 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4242424242 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247690343671 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084366238371 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111149761874 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177699379895 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790833965197 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.